Does an eccentric chainring improve conventional parameters of neuromuscular power ?

Abstract : This study compared the conventional parameters of anaerobic cycling power in physically active non-cyclists using the Pro-Race® system and a traditional chainring. The force--velocity test was chosen for this purpose because it is the shortest validated cycling laboratory test in which each parameter of maximal anaerobic power can be estimated. The power output (Wmax) and the force at whichWmax is produced (Fopt) were significantly improved with the eccentric chainring (1100±227W versus 1006±197W and 1.39±0.15 N/kg body mass versus 1.13±0.16 N/kg body mass with the eccentric and round designs, respectively; P < 0.006 and P < 0.0004, respectively). The power gained (delta power) was significantly correlated with the eccentric chainring Fopt (r = 0.649; P < 0.05), the mid-thigh circumference (r = 0.685; P < 0.05), the estimated lean thigh volume (r = 0.765; P < 0.01) and the estimated lean lower limb volume (r = 0.665; P < 0.05). We concluded that the eccentric chainring significantly improved the estimated anaerobic power output during a force--velocity test by increasing the force component, Fopt. Cautious interpretation of our results suggests that the subjects with physical attributes that contribute to developing high forces may have a significant advantage in performing with the eccentric chainring.
Type de document :
Article dans une revue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Elsevier, 2008, 11 (3), pp.264-270. 〈10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.004〉
Liste complète des métadonnées

https://hal.univ-antilles.fr/hal-00703458
Contributeur : Pamphile Isch <>
Soumis le : vendredi 1 juin 2012 - 21:48:15
Dernière modification le : mercredi 28 mars 2018 - 17:52:01

Identifiants

Collections

Citation

Olivier Hue, Sébastien Racinais, Karim Chamari, Michael Damiani, Claude Hertogh, et al.. Does an eccentric chainring improve conventional parameters of neuromuscular power ?. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, Elsevier, 2008, 11 (3), pp.264-270. 〈10.1016/j.jsams.2007.06.004〉. 〈hal-00703458〉

Partager

Métriques

Consultations de la notice

85