Mathematics and Democracy : Designing Better Voting and Fair-Division Procedures, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1515/9781400835591
URL : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2008.05.013
Approval Voting, 2007. ,
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047
Approval Voting, American Political Science Review, vol.72, issue.03, pp.831-847, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1913653
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00119047
The responsiveness of approval voting: Comments on Saari and Van Newenhizen, Public Choice, vol.10, issue.2, pp.121-131, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1017/S0003055400228475
Rejoinder to Saari and van Newenhizen, Public Choice, vol.59, issue.2, p.149, 1988. ,
Voting systems that combine approval and preferences The mathematics of preference, choice and order, pp.215-237, 2009. ,
The variance of Spearman's rho in normal samples, Biometrika, vol.48, issue.1-2, pp.19-28, 1961. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.19
On the Condorcet Efficiency of Approval Voting and Extended Scoring Rules for Three Alternatives, pp.255-283, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_11
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00533124
Computing Multivariate Normal Positive Orthant Probabilities with 4 and 5 Variables Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication, 2017. ,
The effectiveness of weighted scoring rules when pairwise majority rule cycles exist, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.47, issue.1, pp.69-85, 2004. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(03)00080-5
A representation for quadrivariate normal positive orthant probabilities, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, vol.58, issue.4, pp.349-358, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/49.3-4.433
Robustness of positional scoring over subsets of alternatives, Applied Mathematics & Optimization, vol.28, issue.1, pp.241-255, 1980. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01442897
The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.13, issue.1, pp.14-25, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(76)90063-6
Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules, Social Science Research, vol.7, issue.3, pp.272-283, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0049-089X(78)90014-5
Probabilities of election outcomes for large electorates, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.19, issue.1, pp.38-49, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(78)90054-6
The Condorcet Efficiency Advantage that Voter Indifference Gives to Approval Voting Over Some Other Voting Rules, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.9, issue.2, pp.243-269, 2015. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(74)90073-8
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01450834
The Condorcet efficiency of approval voting and the probability of electing the Condorcet loser, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.29, issue.3, pp.271-283, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4068(97)00020-7
A note on Approval Voting and electing the Condorcet loser, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.80, pp.115-122, 2016. ,
DOI : 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2016.02.009
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452548
Collective Choice for Simple Preferences, Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare, pp.41-90, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_4
Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare, 2010. ,
On the probability of electing the Condorcet, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.25, issue.2, pp.105-116, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0165-4896(93)90046-L
The problem of indeterminacy in approval, multiple, and truncated voting systems, Public Choice, vol.41, issue.2, pp.101-120, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00054447
Is approval voting an ???unmitigated evil????: A response to Brams, Fishburn, and Merrill, Public Choice, vol.59, issue.2, pp.133-147, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00054449
Axiomatizations of Approval Voting, Handbook on Approval Voting. Studies in Choice and Welfare, pp.91-102, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-02839-7_5