The plurality majority converse under single peakedness, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.13, issue.3, pp.365-380, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00179239
Which Scoring Rule Maximizes Condorcet Efficiency Under Iac?, Theory and Decision, vol.2, issue.2, pp.145-185, 2005. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-0348-4118-4_13
The likelihood of the Borda effect in small decision-making committees, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol.33, issue.1, pp.50-56 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1980.tb00776.x
The weak Borda effect and plurality-majority disagreement, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol.37, issue.2, pp.288-292 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00807.x
Rejoinder to Gillett, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol.39, issue.1, pp.87-89 ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1986.tb00848.x
Borda's voting paradox: Theoretical likelihood and electoral occurrences, Behavioral Science, vol.20, issue.1, pp.15-20, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-349-00140-8
Essai sur l'application de l'analysè a la probabilité des décisions renduesà rendues`renduesà la pluralité des voix, 1785. ,
The variance of Spearman's rho in normal samples, Biometrika, vol.48, issue.1-2, pp.19-28, 1961. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/48.1-2.19
Borda???s Paradox with weighted scoring rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.2, issue.1, pp.121-136, 2012. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01213253
Another perspective on Borda???s paradox, Theory and Decision, vol.41, issue.3, pp.99-121, 2018. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1914033
Computing Multivariate Normal Positive Orthant Probabilities with 4 and 5 Variables Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication, 2017. ,
Obtaining representations for probabilities of voting outcomes with effectively unlimited precision integer arithmetic, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.19, issue.3, pp.503-512, 2002. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s003550100127
A representation for quadrivariate normal positive orthant probabilities, Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, vol.58, issue.4, pp.349-358, 1979. ,
DOI : 10.1093/biomet/49.3-4.433
The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.13, issue.1, pp.14-25, 1976. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(76)90063-6
Coincidence probabilities for simple majority and positional voting rules, Social Science Research, vol.7, issue.3, pp.272-283, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0049-089X(78)90014-5
Probabilities of election outcomes for large electorates, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.19, issue.1, pp.38-49, 1978. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0022-0531(78)90054-6
Voting paradoxes and group coherence, 2011. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-3-642-03107-6
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452
On the probability of observing Borda???s paradox, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.54, issue.1, pp.1-23, 2010. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-009-0415-3
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243471
The Condorcet efficiency of approval voting and the probability of electing the Condorcet loser, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.29, issue.3, pp.271-283, 1998. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4068(97)00020-7
The weak Borda effect is of little relevance to social choice theory, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol.39, issue.1, pp.79-86, 1986. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1986.tb00847.x
The weak Borda effect is an unsatisfactory index of plurality/majority disagreement, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol.37, issue.1, pp.128-130, 1984. ,
DOI : 10.1111/j.2044-8317.1984.tb00794.x
Scoring rules and preference restrictions: The strong Borda paradox revisited. Revue d'Economie Politique, pp.375-395, 2017. ,
DOI : 10.3917/redp.273.0375
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01631180
Constant scoring rules, condorcet criteria and single-peaked preferences, Economic Theory, vol.41, issue.3, pp.491-500, 1996. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF00193810
On the probability of electing the Condorcet, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.25, issue.2, pp.105-116, 1993. ,
DOI : 10.1016/0165-4896(93)90046-L
On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.25, issue.6, pp.363-383, 2008. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s00355-007-0236-1
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01245310
Computer simulations of voting systems Applications of simulations to social sciences, pp.181-194, 2000. ,
Scoring rules, Condorcet efficiency and social homogeneity, Theory and Decision, vol.49, issue.2, pp.175-196, 2000. ,
DOI : 10.1023/A:1005257316414
Assessing Contestability of Electoral Outcomes, Quality & Quantity, vol.106, issue.6, pp.719-733, 2001. ,
DOI : 10.1017/CBO9780511606076
Liberalism against populism: a confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice Geometry of voting, 1982. ,
The likelihood of dubious election outcomes, Economic Theory, vol.13, issue.2, pp.345-363, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1007/s001990050258
The geometry of Black's single peakedness and related conditions, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol.32, issue.4, pp.429-456, 1999. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0304-4068(98)00062-7
On the relationship of the Condorcet winner and positional voting rules, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.34, issue.1, pp.81-90, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1016/S0165-4896(97)00005-X
A Glimpse of Impossibility, Perspectives on Political Science, vol.20, issue.1, pp.23-26, 1997. ,
DOI : 10.1007/978-1-4612-2512-6
The Borda method is most likely to respect the Condorcet principle, Economic Theory, vol.41, issue.1, pp.69-83, 1992. ,
DOI : 10.1007/BF01213253
Computation and Manipulation of Enumerators of Integer Projections of Parametric Polytopes, 2005. ,
Comparison of voting systems Probability calculations under the IAC hypothesis, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.54, pp.244-256, 1978. ,
Condorcet's Theory of Voting, The American Political Science Review, vol.82, issue.4, pp.1231-1244, 1988. ,
DOI : 10.2307/1961757