S. J. Brams, The AMS nominating system is vulnerable to truncation of preferences, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol.29, pp.136-138, 1982.

W. Bruns and B. Ichim, Normaliz, algorithms for affine monoids and rational cones, Journal of Algebra, vol.324, issue.5, pp.1098-1113, 2010.

W. Bruns, B. Ichim, and C. Söger, Computations of volumes and Ehrhart series in four candidates elections, Forthcoming in Annals of Operations Research, 2019.

W. Bruns, B. Ichim, T. Römer, R. Sieg, and C. Söger, Normaliz: Algorithms for rational cones and affine monoids, 2018.

B. Büeler, A. Enge, and K. Fukuda, Exact volume computation for polytopes: a practical study, Polytopes-combinatorics and computation, pp.131-154, 2000.

D. Cervone, W. V. Gehrlein, and W. Zwicker, Which scoring rule maximizes Condorcet efficiency under IAC?, Theory and Decision, vol.58, pp.145-185, 2005.

M. Diss and W. V. Gehrlein, The true impact of voting rule selection on Condorcet efficiency, Economics Bulletin, vol.35, issue.4, pp.2418-2426, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01231013

M. Diss and W. V. Gehrlein, Borda's paradox with weighted scoring rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.38, pp.121-136, 2012.

M. Diss, E. Kamwa, and A. Tlidi, On some k-scoring rules for electing committees : Agreement and Condorcet principle, 2020.

M. Diss, E. Kamwa, and A. Tlidi, A Note on the Likelihood of the Absolute Majority Paradoxes, Economics Bulletin, vol.38, issue.4, pp.1727-1734, 2018.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01896273

M. Diss, A. Louichi, V. Merlin, and H. Smaoui, An example of probability computations under the IAC assumption: The stability of scoring rules, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.64, pp.57-66, 2012.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00667660

M. Dummett, Principles of electoral reform, 1997.

A. El-ouafdi, D. Lepelley, and H. Smaoui, Probabilities of electoral outcomes: from threecandidate to four-candidate elections, Theory and Decision, vol.88, pp.205-229, 2020.

D. S. Felsenthal, Review of Paradoxes Afflicting Procedures for Electing a Single Candidate in Electoral Systems : Paradoxes, Assumptions, and Procedures, Studies in Choice and Welfare, 2012.

P. C. Fishburn and S. J. Brams, Paradoxes of preferential voting, Mathematics Magazine, vol.56, pp.207-214, 1983.

P. C. Fishburn and S. J. Brams, Manipulability of voting by sincere truncation of preferences, Public Choice, vol.44, pp.397-410, 1984.

W. V. Gehrlein and P. C. Fishburn, The probability of the paradox of voting: A computable solution, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.13, pp.14-25, 1976.

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Elections, Voting Rules and Paradoxical Outcomes, Publisher, 2017.

W. V. Gehrlein and D. Lepelley, Voting paradoxes and group coherence, 2011.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01243452

W. V. Gehrlein, D. Lepelley, and I. Moyouwou, Voters preference diversity, concepts of agreement and Condorcet's paradox, Quality and Quantity, vol.49, issue.6, pp.2345-2368, 2015.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01452557

E. Kamwa, On the Likelihood of the Borda Effect, The Overall Probabilities for General Weighted Scoring Rules and Scoring Runoff Rules, Group Decision and Negotiation, vol.28, issue.3, pp.519-541, 2019.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01786590

E. Kamwa, V. Merlin, and F. Top, Scoring Runoff Rules, Single-peaked Preferences and Paradoxes of Variable Electorate. Working paper, 2018.

E. Kamwa and I. Moyouwou, Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, Essays by and in honor of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley, 2020.

E. Kamwa and F. Valognes, Scoring rules and preference restrictions: The strong Borda paradox revisited, Revue d'Economie Politique, vol.127, issue.3, pp.375-395, 2017.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01631180

D. M. Kilgour, J. Grã-c-goire, and A. M. Foley, The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections, Forthcoming in Public Choice, 2019.

J. Kruger and Z. Terzopoulou, Strategic manipulation with incomplete preferences: Possibilities and impossibilities for positional scoring rules, Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 2020.

J. Lawrence, Polytope volume computation, Mathematics of Computation, vol.57, pp.259-271, 0195.

K. Kuga and N. Hiroaki, Voter antagonism and the paradox of voting, Econometrica, vol.42, issue.6, pp.1045-1067, 1974.

D. Lepelley, A. Louichi, and H. Smaoui, On Ehrhart polynomials and probability calculations in voting theory, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.30, pp.363-383, 2008.
URL : https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01245310

V. Menon and K. Larson, Computational aspects of strategic behaviour in elections with top-truncated ballots, Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, vol.31, pp.1506-1547, 2017.

H. Moulin, Condorcet's principle implies the no show paradox, Journal of Economic Theory, vol.45, issue.1, pp.53-64, 1988.

I. Moyouwou and H. Tchantcho, Asymptotic vulnerability of positional voting rules to coalitional manipulation, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol.89, pp.70-82, 2015.

N. Narodytska and T. Walsh, The computational impact of partial votes on strategic voting, 2014.

H. Nurmi, Voting Paradoxes and How to Deal with Them, 1999.

F. Plassmann and T. N. Tideman, How frequently do different voting rules encounter voting paradoxes in three-candidate elections?, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.42, issue.1, pp.31-75, 2014.

G. Pritchard and M. Wilson, Exact results on manipulability of positional voting rules, Social Choice and Welfare, vol.29, pp.487-513, 2007.

D. Saari, Z. Terzopoulou, and U. Endriss, Disposing dictators, demystifyng voting paradoxes, The Borda Rule on Top-Truncated Preferences: An Axiomatic Study. Working Paper. ILLC, 2008.

Z. Terzopoulou and U. Endriss, Aggregating incomplete pairwise preferences by weight, Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 2019.