Skip to Main content Skip to Navigation
New interface
Book sections

Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention

Abstract : In an election, individuals may sometimes abstain or report preferences that include ties among candidates. How abstention or ties within individual preferences impact the performances of voting rules is a natural question addressed in the literature. We reconsider this question with respect to one of the main characteristics of a voting rule: its Condorcet efficiency; that is the conditional probability that the rule selects a Condorcet winner assuming that one exists. We explore the impact of both ties and abstention on the Condorcet efficiency of the whole class of weighted scoring rules in three-candidate elections under the Impartial Anonymous Culture assumption. It appears in general that the possibility of indifference or abstention increases or decreases the Condorcet efficiency of weighted scoring rules depending of the rule in consideration or the probability distribution on the set of observable voting situations.
Document type :
Book sections
Complete list of metadata

Cited literature [38 references]  Display  Hide  Download
Contributor : Eric Kamwa Connect in order to contact the contributor
Submitted on : Thursday, November 14, 2019 - 1:33:24 PM
Last modification on : Sunday, June 26, 2022 - 2:42:57 AM


Files produced by the author(s)



Mostapha Diss, Issofa Moyouwou, Hatem Smaoui, Eric Kamwa. Condorcet efficiency of general weighted scoring rules under IAC: indifference and abstention. Springer. Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, Essays by and in honor of William Gehrlein and Dominique Lepelley, pp.55-73, 2021, Studies in Choice and Welfare, ⟨10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6_3⟩. ⟨hal-02196387v2⟩



Record views


Files downloads